« Initial Jobless Claims Dip Still Lower | Main | Generic Bias »
Hey America, Why the Long Face?
A new Fox poll brings familiar (if quizzical) news.
President Bush’s job approval rating slipped this week and stands at a new low of 33 percent approve...
Americans are more than twice as likely to rate the nation’s economy negatively as positively. Nearly 3 in 10 rate economic conditions as either "excellent" (6 percent) or "good" 22 percent, while the widespread consensus is gloomier: about 4 in 10 say the economy is "only fair" (42 percent) and another 30 percent say it is in "poor" shape. Like on most issues these days, there are clear partisan differences on the economy.
Among Republicans, views are evenly divided between a positive rating (50 percent excellent/good) and a negative rating (49 percent only fair/poor). In contrast, almost all Democrats rate the condition of the economy negatively (85 percent only fair/poor).
With the stock market rallying, the labor market sizzling, GDP growing faster than in any other industrialized country (despite war, high oil prices, and natural disasters), all with inflation under control, it's hard to imagine a more robust economy. More money in the hands of taxpayers has led to increased private investment, sustained wealth creation, millions of new jobs, and a far more flexible, resilient, swiftly growing economy.
I find it difficult to believe that 5 of 6 Democrats would objectively deem these conditions "only fair/poor". I don't know whether the gulf between reality and the poll numbers is driven by media distortion of the true economic picture or by the tendency of poll respondents to equivocate "How would you rate the economy?" with "Are you angry with this administration and do you feel the economy is an area where they can be productively attacked?"
For a little historical perspective, let's consider the "misery index", an economic metric coined by Harvard economist Robert Barro in the 1970's. (The index is calculated simply as the sum of the inflation rate and the unemployment rate. And higher = more miserable.)
While it's not a perfect measure, it does take into account two of the weightier economic variables that not only shape the overall health of the economy and quite directly affect consumers and wage earners, but also are notoriously difficult to keep down simultaneously. Normally, when one goes up, the other goes down (except in periods of unsustainable bubbly growth, which explains the Clintonian anomaly), giving further support to the argument that the American economy is currently on uncommonly good footing.
Source data from miseryindex.us. Snazzy chart by yours truly.
High five for lack of misery.
Linked at Stop the ACLU.
Handcrafted by Flip on April 20, 2006 |
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c572653ef00d834ba1ac169e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Hey America, Why the Long Face?:
Comments
The new misery index would have unemployment, inflation, and gas prices. It's the last item, gas prices, that could neatly explain why so many people think the economy isn't doing well. Well, that and the fact that the media keeps saying that the economy is bad despite the stock market doing well, corporate earnings and profits are in line without cooking the books, and unemployment is at or near historical lows.Posted by: lawhawk | Apr 21, 2006 1:55:25 PM
Ah, but the misery index is slightly higher under George W. Bush than under his Democratic immediate predecessor, Bill Clinton. This may be another example of an American historical phenomenon I've seen discussed before. Basically it's that at least since the Great Depression, the public mind seems to have acquired higher expectations and/or greater sensitivity toward any manner of societal ills. For example, in the Great Depression the unemployment rate hovered around 25%. Subsequent economic downturns, even at their worst points, have produced far lower unemployment figures, but that did little to disabuse the public of the impression that it was the Great Depression all over again. Of course, this phenomenon is by no means limited to economics. Consider the demagoguery from certain black politicians and activists who claim that the lot of blacks today is really no better than slavery. Presumably they wouldn't bother with such demagoguery if it didn't work; i.e. if their fellow black people didn't believe it. Then, of course, there's the whole "Iraq = Vietnam" meme, despite the U.S. casualty rate in Iraq being a tiny fraction of what it was in Vietnam. All these cases (and I'm sure there are others) have one thing in common: Improvement over time doesn't necessarily breed satisfaction; rather it simply moves the goalposts.Posted by: Joshua | Apr 21, 2006 2:17:14 PM

