« Tom Vilsack, Come On Down! | Main | Hillary's 3Q Refunds Part II: Return To Sender »
Hillary's 3rd Quarter Refunds: Large, But Lacking
Hoo boy, this is one meaty filing. Senator Clinton previously vowed to return $850,000 in Norman Hsu-connected contributions to some 260 donors. Her 3rd quarter filing shows refunds to no fewer than 487 individuals for a total of $1.24 million.
This will take a little time to chew through, but we now have our arms around the 200+ missing Hsu donors and the several hundred thousand missing dollars. It's just a matter of eliminating the unrelated refunds (accidental overpayments and the like) before we'll have a list of the previously unknown Hsu-connected donors to trace back through prior periods for both Clinton and other Hsu-favored candidates to bring us up to the new grand total.
But even before we do the deep dive, some problems bubble feverishly to the surface.
Consider this a rough cut through the data, subject to revision, but I'm showing more than $125,000 in thus far unrefunded contributions made by previously identified suspected Hsu straw donors (most of whom the Clinton campaign seems to acknowledge as Hsu-connected donors by virtue of the partial refunds they issued during the quarter).
18 of the 26 Hsu-connected donors listed below receieved only partial refunds for their aggregate Clinton contributions. Just 2 of them received full refunds. 6 others (including 2 members of the Paw family) received no refunds.
It's important to note that this data does not include any refunds that HillPAC may have separately issued. Once that data is available, I'll update accordingly. As currently illustrated, the Clinton campaign appears to have refunded just over 40% of the previously identified Hsu-connected donations.

It's also important to remember that any of these Clinton donors who were reimbursed by Norman Hsu for such donations (allegedly with funds Hsu swindled out of unwitting investors) are not the legitimate owners of those funds. Hundreds of investors in New York and California who allege Hsu bilked them out of more than $60 million are the primary aggrieved parties to any such swindling. Clinton's refunds, however partial, represent only the first step in returning such funds to their rightful owners.
We can only hope that federal authorities are rapidly chasing down each refund recipient to determine the appropriate dispotition of the involved funds, per the outcome of the ongoing civil and criminal complaints pending against Hsu.
For background research, earlier ruminations, and links to the online data sets, sidle on over to the Norman Hsu category page.
Update: It's possible some of the missing funds were refunded via Hillary's Senate campaign fund, though most of that money was transferred to her Presidential campaign during the first quarter of this year. While the third quarter report for Clinton's Senate campaign committee was also due October 15th, those filings are not submitted electronically and are therefore not yet available for review. Via the Center for Responsive Politics, the most recent data is current as of 12/31/06.
Update (10/16): Well, I was going to post an update, but it grew into a post of its own. This way, please.
Handcrafted by Flip on October 15, 2007 |
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/396377/22478682
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Hillary's 3rd Quarter Refunds: Large, But Lacking:
» More Hsu Donors Revealed from Flopping Aces
Suitably Flip is taking a look at the numbers being released by the campaigns today and is coming across some interesting new twists in the Hsu scandal. The first to be looked at is Tom Vilsack:While no longer an active... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 15, 2007 11:49:22 PM
» Hillary Clinton's amended fundraising report from Brain Shavings
Keep your eye on Hillary Clinton's amended 3rd quarter fundraising report to the Federal Election Commission. Former candidate Tom Vilsack returned $4,300 to Norman Hsu and pals, and today's the deadline for filing amended Q3 campaign finance reports. ... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 16, 2007 3:55:10 AM
» Mrs. Clinton's Eavesdropping Problem from JammieWearingFool
Meanwhile, her Norman Hsu problem isn't quite going away, as reported by Suitably Flip. You just knew this greedy woman wasn't going to willingly part with her shady cash, did you? [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 16, 2007 8:28:48 AM
» UPDATE:Hillary Didnt Return Her Hsus Vilsack Got Hsued from Right Voices
UPDATE: Hillary made a promise to return the money, but she didnt quite live up to her promise!
Consider this a rough cut through the data, subject to revision, but Im showing more than $125,000 in thus far unrefunded contributions made b... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 16, 2007 9:35:57 AM
» tax refund from http://sciencetaxrefund.info
Different tax refund prices. [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 11, 2008 12:11:29 PM
» How long does 1mg of xanax stay in your system. from Xanax online without prescription.
Buy xanax. Xanax online. Xanax. Xanax xr. Side effects of xanax. [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 15, 2008 11:56:25 PM
» braces from http://thebraces.info
Read about braces. [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 16, 2008 4:25:16 PM
» Bactrim. from Bactrim and alcohol.
What does bactrim look like. Bactrim. Bactrim and mrsa. What is bactrim. Side effects of bactrim. [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 17, 2008 7:01:47 AM
» Phentermine. from Phentermine adipex.
Phentermine online. Phentermine. Phentermine without prescription. Phentermine weight loss. [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 29, 2008 4:48:31 PM
Comments
I see 671 total refunds in the report.Posted by: JustADude | Oct 15, 2007 11:49:01 PM
I'm glad you're tracking this down instead of me. It's mind-numbing, and undoubtedly intentionally-so.Posted by: steveegg | Oct 15, 2007 11:50:32 PM
Solange Sandy got 4600.00Posted by: JustADude | Oct 15, 2007 11:53:35 PM
I did a random check on one donor, Brian Bondarchuk 53 Sylvan Dr Wading River, New York 117921822 09/14/2007 Refund 2300.00 Brian Bondarchuk 53 Sylvan Dr Wading River, New York 117921822 09/14/2007 Refund 2300.00 He was refunded $4600, but his contributions to Hillary in 2006 and 2007 totaled $8800. Hillary is going to have some more 'splaining" to do!!!!Posted by: Larry | Oct 15, 2007 11:54:20 PM
Larry, that one sounds like an overpayment refund. I haven't run into Bondarchuk in the course of the Hsu investigation. If he's involved, of course he should be fully refunded, but if he's a garden variety Hillary contributor who inadventantly tripped over the federal limits, his refunds ought to be just enough to bring him down to $4,600 per cycle.Posted by: Flip | Oct 16, 2007 12:03:42 AM
I am putting together a list of everyone in the return list their complete donation history. I am finding some refunded without a donor record Also finding some refunded more than the gavePosted by: JustADude | Oct 16, 2007 12:48:35 AM
Charles and Jennifer fit for being marks in the California scam part he runs El Dorado VenturesPosted by: JustADude | Oct 16, 2007 12:51:53 AM
Sorry last name BeelerPosted by: JustADude | Oct 16, 2007 12:52:19 AM
Yau Cheng of source financing got 4600.00Posted by: JustADude | Oct 16, 2007 1:22:58 AM
The oddity here is that between all the other dem candidates they total about 20 to 30 or less refunds combined.Posted by: JustADude | Oct 16, 2007 4:30:28 AM
Flip: Excellent work! I agree with the previous post that it is mind numbing. I know Clinton , Inc. is counting on everyone losing interest and the government being late so that it doesn't matter for the election. Keep going!!Posted by: Terri | Oct 16, 2007 10:52:21 AM
Flip, I know you did a prior post about Vilsack. Didn't I hear something some time ago about Hillary settling his campaign debts in return for his endorsement of her for president? You really didn't think Hillary would take money out of her own pocket to pay Vilsack's debts, do ya? I mean, why do that when you've got so many fat cat friends who willingly cover your every cash crunch? The Feds are going to have a hell of a time figuring things out now that even SOME of the money has been returned! It's going to make their work much harder than if they had frozen all Hsu-related donor $$ until this was thoroughly investigated. Now it is so muddied up that it may be nigh impossible for them to figure out before the elections. I mean, is the IRS going to demand that refunded donors now report their new earnings to them? Comments?Posted by: cornhusker | Oct 16, 2007 12:19:25 PM

